The M-Ah site comes to life
Posted by Emma21 on 9th Jan 2017 in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The M-Ah site comes to lifeHello!
Starting with a new menu structure, the site of Matter-Antimatter hypothesis comes to life this year and will be gradually filled up with new content.
Thanks for your patience and enjoy the reading!
Thank you!
Posted by Emma21 on 24th Nov 2016 in Uncategorized | 1 commentHello!
Fills my heart with warmth to see the number of subscribers to this Blog ever growing. This shows to me that the subject is of interest and many people bother about such questions.
I appreciate your attention! This motivates me to do my best to create the technical conditions for a fully functioning site here.
Thanks again, and see you soon with a whole pack of new informations!
2015 is the year of light
Posted by Emma21 on 25th Dec 2015 in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 2015 is the year of lightThe European Physical Society declared 2015 the international year of light and light-based technologies. So, this year more than any time, Physics has the duty to give a clear answer to the question “WHAT IS LIGHT?”. While there are at least five different models used currently in sciences and technology up to date, there is no unified view about this very basic, natural phenomenon. I’ve found a handful of references where the authors mention that A. Einstein, until the end of his life did not relinquish to raise this question at different conferences. And this problem is still there today.
I am convinced that once we understand better the nature, behaviour and the laws governing the smallest, the Planck-scale, we will be able to give a definitive answer to this question.
On this site, above in the menu you will find my suggestions to describe correctly the Planck-scale and light.
Based on Europhysics News 46/2, 2015.
The relativity of Relativity
Posted by Emma21 on 24th Nov 2015 in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The relativity of RelativityHi everybody!
When I’ve visited the exhibition “Annus Mirabilis of Albert Einstein” in 2005 in Bern, I did not expect to learn much new. Indeed, I left with the sentiment that I knew much, if not all of that already from my university studies. Nevertheless, I had to realise later that the visit had a major impact on me.
Of one side, I have realised that between 1905 when the Special Relativity theory was published until 1915, when General Relativity was made public, ten years went on, a laps of time certainly full of work and efforts. So, I’ve concluded, if I have something valuable to tell, I should not be afraid to work even 10 years to render it public.
On the other hand, the nearly physical contact with the exposed objects revealed in me the feeling that “Oh my God! We have here some very old stuff!”. Even if his theory is the leading theory of today’s science and has still much success, we are driving a 100-years old car! It is just unbelievable that we did not change since nearly anything in our perception of macro-world! I became overwhelmed by questions like: “If a genius like him would weak-up today, what he would tell about his theory?”, “What Einstein missed to build a more up-to date theory?”, “Did we really not discover anything major that would lead to better answers to modern sciences?”. Such questions led me to do an inventory of discoveries made since he published his ground-breaking works. I’ve realised that there are many discoveries made since, that Einstein could not know about or he did not accept. Examples include antimatter (discovered in 1926), quantum-mechanics (refined at the same epoch), elementary particles and forces, high energy physics, topology, hyperbolic geometry (although discovered earlier, still not used yet anywhere), and many-many astronomic observations (like black-holes, Big Bang, expansion of the Universe, etc.). Step-by-step, I became convinced that if we add all these ingredients to the old knowledge, we are able to build a new picture of Nature, a theory that is able to answer the big questions left open in modern sciences. This is how M-Ah was born, and is about to be made public here.
So, I wish you patience in discovering on these pages something new! I can insure you that worths the effort!
Tibor
And why not Emma?
Posted by Emma21 on 9th Nov 2015 in Uncategorized | Comments Off on And why not Emma?Hello everybody!
Not so long time ago I was ready to admit in public that EMMA is my “péché mignon” 😉
Now, without joking, I was seriously tempted to coin the name to the set of concepts presented on theese pages “EMMA” or “EMMAh”. Because my hypothesis not only draws a clear and understandable distinction between matter and antimatter, but is able to explain from where that enormous quantity of energy and matter comes and how bodies gain their mass. Because of theese, a name like “Energy – Mass – Matter – Antimatter hypothesis” would be more correct to use.
Eventually, I cannot, for two reasons. One of them is that I cannot expect that everybody having that first-name agree with my ideas. On the other hand, EMMA is already in use by a British “enhanced” electron accelerator project. Soo pity! Really! Therefore, let’s keep that four letters as a nick-name to my hypothesis and continue to use “Matter-Antimatter” formally.
Have a nice evening!
Tibor