And why not Emma?

Hello everybody!

Not so long time ago I was ready to admit in public that EMMA is my “péché mignon” 😉

Now, without joking, I was seriously tempted to coin the name to the set of concepts presented on theese pages “EMMA” or “EMMAh”. Because my hypothesis not only draws a clear and understandable distinction between matter and antimatter, but is able to explain from where that enormous quantity of energy and matter comes and how bodies gain their mass. Because of theese, a name like “Energy – Mass – Matter – Antimatter hypothesis” would be more correct to use.

Eventually, I cannot, for two reasons. One of them is that I cannot expect that everybody having that first-name agree with my ideas. On the other hand, EMMA is already in use by a British “enhanced” electron accelerator project. Soo pity! Really! Therefore, let’s keep that four letters as a nick-name to my hypothesis and continue to use “Matter-Antimatter” formally.

Have a nice evening!

                                                 Tibor

 

Comments are closed.